by DB on Tue Jul 06, 2010 1:46 pm
While Hicks probably thought it was a good bit of investigative journalism, his article was a classic case of biased reporting. There are a wealth of factors he didn't even consider at all. For one, lower picks like the Visenkas and Anderssons had little to no chance of a pro career. Second, changes in coaching made a huge difference. Developing under a DeBoer or Spott is much more likely than under a Brian Hayton. Also, Kitchener has had three (soon to be four) of its imports drafted in the 1st round of the NHL. That is an awesome track record. They took a kid like Valabik who wasn't even on junior teams' radars and made him a 10th overall NHL pick. That's miraculous development.
Finally, Hicks greedily makes the point that players like Sturm developed just fine in his native Germany. Really? Is that not blatantly ignoring the thousands upon thousands of players in that system who never even got a sniff at a pro career, many of whom would have lost that opportunity due to the lack of exposure, inferior coaching, etc. Sturm appears much more like the anomoly than the norm. And if Hicks is going to use that as an example, then it's only fair to say that the Rangers' system has produced Richards, Roy, Bellows, MacInnis, etc., etc. Or actually, it'd be even more accurate to cite all of the players the CHL has produced as opposed to Germany. That is much more apples to apples.
With all due respect to Hicks, it's assinine to suggest there is nothing to be gained by Reider in playing here. Really Hicks? Nothing to be gained by playing in an NHL scouting hot-bed that has produced no fewer than 6 1st round NHL picks this decade, and ample other NHL players - many of whom were brought from anonymity to stardom in this organization (Spaling, Clarkson, etc.).
I would think playing alongside Jeff Skinner and Ryan Murphy just might help your career a tad more than suiting up for Landshut. And to suggest otherwise is to turn a complete blind eye to the facts.
I am generally not a Hicks basher. He is entitled to his opinions. But I hate journalism that only tells one side of a story and only presents the facts that support the author's thesis. Try some balance Jeff.